|
Query No.
11
Subject:
Treatment of retention money
in the financial
tatements of a contractee.1
A. Facts of the
Case
1. A company is setting up
an integrated iron and steel plant.
The entire work for setting up the plant has been divided into several
packages which have been awarded to different contractors for execution.
2. The terms of payment in
various contracts are as below:
(i) For civil contracts
(a) 10% of total contract price as mobilisation advance shall be paid after
signing of the contract, and subject to submission of pre-receipted invoice and
bank guarantee.
(b) 80% of the total value of work executed shall be paid on monthly pro-rata
basis subject to satisfactory progress of work and on certification of work by
the purchaser (i.e., the company)/its consultants and on submission of certain
documents. Total value of works
executed shall be arrived based on actual quantity of works executed as
certified by the purchaser/consultant and unit rates applicable for such items
of work.
(c) 10% of the contract price shall be paid on issue of completion
certificate by the purchaser against submission of pre-receipted invoice and
bank guarantee for equal amount valid till the expiry of maintenance and
guarantee period.
(ii) For supply
contracts
(a) 10% of ex-works price towards supplies shall be paid as advance after
signing of the contract. Payment
shall be released only after submission of a bank guarantee for equal amount
valid till sixty days after the completion of supplies and having submitted the
bank guarantee towards security deposit.
(b)75% of the ex-works price of the supplies and 100% of taxes, duties and
freight on pro-rata basis subject to submission of requisite documents as per
despatch instructions.
(c) 5%
of the ex-works price after issue of preliminary acceptance
certificate.
(d) 5%
of the ex-works price after issue of commissioning certificate and submission of
a fresh bank guarantee for 5% of total contract price towards guarantee/warranty
valid till the expiry of guarantee/warranty period.
(e) 5%
of the ex-works price after issue of final acceptance
certificate.
(iii) For erection and fabrication
contracts
(a) 5%
of the contract price as advance against submission of bank guarantee for equal
amount and another bank guarantee towards security deposit for 10% of the total
contract price. Both the bank
guarantees will be valid till sixty days after issue of commissioning
certificate.
(b) 5%
of the contract price after mobilisation of men and material handling equipment
as approved by the purchaser/consultant to commence erection work at site and
establishment of site office and stores.
The payment shall be released on receipt of a bank guarantee for equal
value valid till sixty days after issue of commissioning
certificate.
(c) 75% of the contract price on monthly pro-rata basis as per approved
billing schedule subject to satisfactory progress of work as per milestones
fixed and duly certified by purchaser/consultant on production of requisite
documents.
(d) 5%
of the contract price after issue of preliminary acceptance
certificate.
(e) 5%
of the contract price on issue of commissioning certificate and submission of a
performance bank guarantee for 5% of the total contract price towards
guarantee/warranty valid till the expiry of guarantee/warranty
period.
(f) 5%
of the contract price upon issue of final acceptance
certificate.
3. The querist has
reproduced the company’s accounting policy relating to capital work-in-progress
which is as below:
“In accounting for the capital WIP, the portion
that has been retained as per terms of contract is not accounted for till it
becomes due for payment/release of amounts after completion of the
job.”
4. Keeping the above in
view, the company accounts for capital work-in-progress in the following
manner:
(a) For civil works: 90% of the value of
work completed and certified by the principal consultant is booked as capital
WIP (being 10% towards adjustment of mobilisation advance and 80% towards
progress payments).
(b) For supply, and erection and fabrication
contracts: 85% of the value of work completed or supply made as certified by
the principal consultant is booked as capital WIP (being 10% towards adjustment
of mobilisation advance and 75% towards progress payments).
(c) The balance (10% or 15%
of the contract price, as the case may be) is not accounted for till the
issuance of preliminary acceptance certificate, commissioning certificate and
final acceptance certificate as provided in the contract.
B. Queries
5. The querist has sought
the opinion of the Expert Advisory Committee on the following
issues:
(a) Whether the accounting
policy followed by the company is correct.
(b) Whether the method of
accounting for capital work-in-progress is correct.
(c) Whether the method of
not accounting for 10% of the contract price in the case of civil contracts, and
15% of the contract price in the case of supply or erection or fabrication
contracts, pending final certification is correct.
(d) If the answer to (a) is
in the negative, what should be the correct accounting policy and method of
accounting to be followed by the company?
C. Points Considered by the
Committee
6. The Committee notes
that Accounting Standard (AS) 7, ‘Accounting for Construction Contracts’, deals
with accounting for construction contracts in the financial statements of
contractors. The present query, on
the other hand, relates to certain issues relating to accounting for
construction contracts from the view point of a contractee. As such, AS 7 is not applicable to the
present query.
7. The Committee is of the
view that the point of time when an enterprise should recognise an item as its
asset is that when significant risks and rewards of ownership pass on to the
enterprise. In the present case,
the company is accounting for capital work-in-progress in its books
progressively over the period of the contracts without awaiting the completion
of the construction work. The Committee presumes that as per the terms of the
contracts, significant risks and rewards of ownership pass on to the company as
the construction activity progresses and not at the time of completion of
construction activities.
8. The Committee is of the
view that in the present case, the amount at which capital work-in-progress
should be recognised by the company should reflect the stage of contract
performance. As the progress
payments may not necessarily reflect the stage of contract performance,
accounting for capital work-in-progress based on progress payments would not be
appropriate.
9. In order to recognise
capital work-in-progress based on the stage of contract performance, it is
essential that such stage should be capable of being reasonably estimated. In this regard, the Committee notes that
the stage of contract performance at a given point of time may comprise two
elements: work certified by the company and work not yet so certified. The Committee is of the view that as far
as the work not certified is concerned, it should be included in capital
work-in-progress only if a reliable estimate thereof can be made. If such is not the case, the capital
work-in-progress should be recognised based on the work certified
only.
10. The Committee notes that in respect of various kinds of contracts, the
terms and conditions stipulate certain amount be given to the contractor after
signing of the contracts as mobilisation advance. The terms and conditions also provide
for retention of certain amounts pending issuance of certain certificates. Based on the facts available, the
Committee is of the view that mobilisation advances to contractors and retention
monies are not related to, and therefore do not reflect (except only
incidentally), the stage of contract performance.
D. Opinion
11. On the basis of the above, the Committee is of the following opinion on
the issues raised in paragraph 5:
(a) The accounting policy
followed by the company as described in paragraph 3 above is not correct. The capital work-in-progress should
reflect the stage of contract performance to the extent it can be measured
reliably.
(b) Please see (a)
above.
(c) Please see (a)
above.
(d) Please see (a)
above.
1 Opinion finalised by the Committee on
22.4.2000.
|