Expert Advisory Committee
ICAI-Expert Advisory Committee
Options:

Query No. 13

Subject:

Presentation of ‘book overdraft’ in the books of account.1

A. Facts of the Case

1. A public sector company is engaged in rendering comprehensive consultancy services in the field of hospital planning, design, detail engineering, quality control, project management and monitoring as well as procurement, supply, installation and commissioning of medical equipments for the projects assigned to it by the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Ministry of External Affairs, private and public sector organisations as well as various state governments.

2. The querist has stated that during the course of its business, the company issues cheques to its vendors/contractors/suppliers against the work done. As per the querist, the company has flexideposits linked with various banks along with the current and savings accounts for separate corpus. Cheques are being issued from the current/savings bank account and as per the requirement of funds, the flexi-deposits are being encashed and the proceeds are transferred to the current/savings bank account for release of payments by the banks.

3. The querist has further stated that sometimes the cheques issued to vendors/contractors/suppliers are not presented for payment on a particular date, say, on 31st March every year, which results in credit balance in the current/savings account in the books of the company, which is generally termed as ‘book overdraft’. On the other hand, physical balance in the form of flexideposits exists in the bank’s books as well as in the books of the company on that particular date. As per the querist, the book overdraft is prominently shown by the company under the head ‘Current Liabilities and Provisions’ whereas, flexi-deposits are shown under the head ‘Cash & Bank Balances’. This practice is being followed consistently by the company since a number of years.

4. According to the querist, the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (C&AG) has raised the following issues in respect of cash and bank balances of Rs. 202.65 crore, shown under the head ‘Current Assets, Loans and Advances’ on the ‘Assets’ side of the balance sheet:               

(a) Provisional comment

                           

The ‘cash and bank balances’ is overstated by Rs. 4.20 crore due to inclusion of amount of cheques issued but not presented for payment before 31st March, 2006. As the company had issued the cheques before 31st March, 2006, the same should have been deducted from cash and bank balances (flexi-accounts) instead of showing separately as book overdraft under the head current liabilities and provisions.
                         

This has resulted in overstatement of cash and bank balances by Rs. 4.20 crore with corresponding overstatement of current liabilities by the same amount.
                

(b) Final comment
                

Further, they have revised their comments as follows:
               

“The ‘cash and bank balances’ is overstated by Rs. 5.01 crore due to inclusion of cheques of Rs. 5.01 crore, issued before 31st March, 2006. The company instead of reducing the cash and bank balances has treated them as ‘book overdraft’. Consequently, current liabilities are also overstated by the same amount”.

5. The querist has informed that the company’s replies were as follows:

            

(a) Against provisional comment
                

“The credit balance in bank account of the company as book overdraft under the current liabilities results as cheques are not being presented for payment and the amount is not being utilised but physical bank balance exists against the same. This practice is being followed continuously for last number of years.
                 

As per the Compendium of Opinions - Vol. I, issued by the Expert Advisory Committee of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), the bank overdraft can be included under the sub-head of sundry creditors.
                

The same interpretation has accordingly been viewed here also and book overdraft has been shown under the head ‘Current Liabilities and Provisions’ by prominently disclosing under the sub-head.
                

Further, primarily flexi-deposits are opened for any shortfall in the current accounts and the banks are authorised to use amount from flexi-deposits.
               

As on 31st March, 2006, it is not known when the cheques will be presented in the bank and the position of the current account will be known only after presentation of the cheques.
             

The method of recording these financial entries is well recognised accounting method and this method has been consistently followed in all the previous years.
          

In view of above, the provisional comments may be dropped.”
        

(b) Against final comment
            

“Credit balance in the bank accounts in the books of the company include cheque issued but not presented for payment which has been disclosed as ‘book overdraft’ under the head ‘Current Liabilities’ and bank balance in deposit account has been disclosed under the head ‘Current Assets’ in accordance with the general accounting principles. This disclosure has been consistently followed by the company for last more than two decades, in line with accounting policies followed in other public sector undertakings and private sector companies. The matter will be referred to ICAI for opinion in this regard.”

B. Query

6. The querist has sought the opinion of the Expert Advisory Committee as to whether the practice followed by the company of showing ‘book overdraft’ under the head ‘Current Liabilities’ is correct. Alternatively, whether amount of book overdraft can be adjusted from the head ‘Cash & Bank Balances’, including flexideposits, whereas the said flexi-deposits are physically not encashed as on a particular date, i.e., on 31.3.06 and consequently, decreasing the corresponding side of current liabilities also.

C. Points considered by the Committee

7. The Committee notes that the basic issue raised in the query relates to disclosure of cheques issued to vendors/contractors/ suppliers but not yet presented for payment, which results in the credit balance in the current/savings bank account in the books of the company, i.e., book overdraft. The Committee has, therefore, considered only this issue and has not touched upon any other issue arising from the Facts of the Case, such as, disclosure of flexi-deposits, etc. From the facts of the query, the Committee presumes that the flexi-deposits are separate deposit accounts and the amounts therefrom are transferred to the current/savings account in case of overdraft.

8. The Committee notes that one of the basic principles of preparation of the financial statements is to record transactions and events that occur in or relate to the accounting period for which the financial statements are prepared. Thus, where the accounting period ends on 31st March, all transactions and events that take place upto 31st March should be reflected in the financial statements as of that date. Therefore, the Committee is of the view that cheques issued upto 31st March but not presented for payment upto 31st March should be accounted for in the period in which they are issued. Thus, the vendors/contractors/suppliers should be debited and the bank account should be credited in respect of cheques issued upto 31st March but not presented for payment upto 31st March, even though it results in credit balance, i.e., ‘book overdraft’ in the cash book of the company whereas the physical balance against those cheques is still lying in the bank accounts as per the bank pass book. In the view of the Committee, these cheques are only an item of reconciliation between the cash book and the pass book of the company and do not have any accounting effect on the financial statements prepared on the accrual basis of accounting. This aspect is addressed by preparing a statement normally termed as ‘Bank Reconciliation Statement’.

9. As far as the presentation of such credit/negative balance of bank account in the books of the company is concerned, the Committee notes that ‘Instructions in accordance with which assets should be made out’ with respect to item 7(B), ‘Bank Balances’, of Part I of Schedule VI to the Companies Act, 1956, inter alia, states as follows:

“In regard to bank balances, particulars to be given separately of –

(a) the balances lying with Scheduled Banks on current accounts, call accounts, and deposit accounts”.
From the above, the Committee notes that Schedule VI requires disclosure of balances of various types of bank accounts lying with the bank as on the balance sheet date.

10. The Committee further notes from the Facts of the Case that the negative balance in the current/savings bank account can be set-off against the positive balances of flexi-deposits lying with the bank. Thus, in the view of the Committee, as on the date of the balance sheet, the present obligation of the company in respect of bank overdraft can be set-off against the balance lying in the flexideposit account. Thus, in substance, as far as the company is concerned, the position is that the composite bank balance including the balance in flexi-deposit account of the company is positive, even though, the physical set-off has not been made on the date of the balance sheet. With regard to disclosure of the balances, the Committee is of the view that in the present case, in respect of the cheques not presented for payment upto the balance sheet date, the company should disclose the negative balance in the current/savings bank account as per cash book and the same should be shown as a set-off against the balance of flexi-deposit account in the inner column, under the head ‘cash and bank balances’ on the ‘Assets’ side of the balance sheet. However, in the view of the Committee, it would not be incorrect to disclose the negative balance in the bank account, i.e., bank overdraft under the head ‘Current Liabilities and Provisions’ on the ‘Liabilities’ side of the balance sheet.

11. The Committee also notes that in the opinion (Query no. 1.31 of Compendium of Opinions – Vol. I) referred to by the company while supporting its accounting treatment in paragraph 5 above, it has been opined that in case the bank does not have a right of set-off of negative balance in one account against positive balance in another account, it would not be appropriate to set-off the overdrawn balance against the other positive balances lying with the banks and showing it under ‘cash and bank balances’ on the ‘Assets’ side of the balance sheet. However, since in the present case, the banks have the right to adjust the negative balance in current/savings account with the positive balance in the flexi-deposit account, it would be more informative and useful for the users of the financial statements to disclose the negative bank balances as a set-off from flexi-deposit account in the manner explained in paragraph 10 above.

D. Opinion

12. On the basis of the above, the Committee is of the opinion, subject to the presumption stated in paragraph 7 above, that in respect of cheques issued upto 31st March but not presented for payment upto 31st March, resulting into credit/negative balance in the current/savings bank account in the books of the company which can be adjusted by making a transfer from the balance lying in the flexi-deposit accounts, it would be more informative and useful for the users of the financial statements to disclose the said negative balances as a set-off from flexi-deposit account in the manner explained in paragraph 10 above. However, disclosure of the said negative balances as ‘book overdraft’ under the head ‘Current Liabilities and Provisions’ on the ‘Liabilities’ side of the balance sheet would not be incorrect.

1 Opinion finalised by the Committee on 14.5.2007.