Expert Advisory Committee
ICAI-Expert Advisory Committee
Options:

Query No. 11

Subject:

Accounting for expenditure in proportion to sales by a hydroelectric power generating enterprise

for the purpose of interim financial statements – whether appropriate.1

 

A. Facts of the Case

1. A public sector enterprise registered under the Companies Act, 1956, is engaged in construction and operation of hydroelectric power projects.

2. The querist has stated that generation of electricity in hydro projects mainly depends on availability of machine and water. Machine is always available throughout the year except for planned outage and in rare circumstances, break down of machine. Availability of water is seasonal because in summers and monsoon season, availability of water is more due to melting of snow and increase in flow of water due to rains as compared to other seasons. As such, in the first two quarters of the financial year (April to September), being the summer and rainy seasons, generation of electricity is more as compared to the last two quarters of the financial year (October to March).

3. The company is under the regulatory regime, and tariff (sale price) for electricity is fixed by Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC). The regulator fixes tariff in the form of annual fixed charges (AFC). AFC is normally fixed by CERC for a period of 5 years and it is determined keeping in view the capital cost of power station, loan repayment schedule, capital structure, etc. The constituents of AFC are six components as detailed below:

       A. Interest on loans

      Interest on outstanding loans towards capital cost duly taking into account the schedule of repayments, as approved by the authority, is allowed in AFC.

      B. Depreciation

      Depreciation is calculated for each year as per straight line method at the rate of depreciation as prescribed by the CERC. Value base for the purpose of depreciation shall be historical cost of assets. Depreciation during the life of the project is limited to 90% of the approved capital cost.

      C. Advance against depreciation (AAD)

     To meet out cash flow for repayment of loans, this additional amount is provided limited to 1/10th of loan. AAD in a year shall be restricted to the extent of difference between cumulative repayment and cumulative depreciation up to that year. In other words, to facilitate repayment of loan towards capital cost, short fall of depreciation to the extent of 1/10th of the loan amount or actual repayment whichever is lower, is allowed by CERC in the form of AAD.

      D. Return on equity

      Return on equity is allowed @ 14% p.a. on admitted amount of equity.

      E. Operation and maintenance (O&M) expenses

      1.5% of approved capital cost further escalated at 4% p.a. for the subsequent years is allowed as O&M expenses.

      F. Interest on working capital

      Interest on working capital is allowed on the sum of the following amounts:
           - O&M expenses for 1 month.
           - Maintenance spares @ 1% of the historical cost escalated @ 6% per annum from the date of commercial operation.
          - Receivables equivalent to two months of fixed charges for sale of electricity. Interest rate for above purpose is to be taken equivalent to short-term prime lending rate of SBI.

Tariff for a year is fixed in such a way that 90% of the capital cost of the project is recovered through depreciation and AAD over the project life which is around 35 years in addition to other components as explained above.

4. The querist has further stated that the quantum of AFC as fixed above is linked with design energy. The design energy means the quantum of energy which would be generated in a year by a particular power station. Design energy is fixed considering availability of water in each calendar month of the year and installed capacity of the power station and the same remains unaltered throughout the life of the power station. As such, in 1st half of the financial year, being the rainy and snow melting period, design energy has been fixed more as compared to later half of the financial year. Further, design energy is identified for each calendar month of the year. In other words, design energy is a sort of theoretical quantity in terms of million units which is fixed considering all related parameters at the time when a project is sanctioned for construction. Actual generation may be either higher or lower of the design energy. In case actual generation exceeds design energy, extra generation is compensated over and above AFC. Like wise, if the generation is less than a certain percentage of design energy due to reasons within the control of generating company, recovery of AFC is reduced.

5. The AFC is recovered in two parts from the buyers:

       (1) Energy charges

       (2) Capacity charges

The energy charges are the product of actual generation limited to design energy and “Energy Rate per KWH”. The Energy rate per KWH is the lowest variable rate per KWH applicable in case of thermal power station operating in the region. The difference of AFC and annual energy charge is known as capacity charge which is recovered monthly prorata in the ratio of units sold.

6. As per CERC rules, monthly billing is done on the basis of generation data (known as ‘Regional Energy Account’) received from Regional Power Committee. Keeping in view the principle explained in paragraph 4 above, in the first half of the year, more recovery of AFC is made as compared to the second half of the year. This implies that in the first half of the year, recovery towards interest on loan, interest on working capital, depreciation, AAD and O&M expenses is more compared to the recovery in the second half of the year, whereas all cost components are recorded in the accounts on actual basis following accrual system. Moreover, in the second half of the year, recovery towards cost (built in AFC) is less and cost actually incurred will be more. Therefore, results of the first half would be showing major portion of annual profit whereas the second half would be showing either low profit or may result even in loss. As such, according to the querist, results of the two halves of the same year would not be comparable and the matching concept of revenue and expenditure would also not be met. Similarly, the quarterly results of all the quarters are not comparable.

7. The querist has informed that to address the problem of comparability and to comply with the matching principle of accounting, for the purpose of interim financial statements, the company has been following the principle of recognising depreciation, AAD, interest on loan and some components of O&M expenses (self insurance contingency and cost of employee benefits based on actuarial valuation) in proportion to actual sales for the period to projected sales for the year (emphasis supplied by the querist). This treatment which is being followed consistently and is supplemented by a suitable disclosure through notes to accounts is as under:

      “April to September is the peak period of generation because of availability of water. Accordingly, depreciation, AAD, interest on loan, self insurance and provision for long term employee benefits and post employment benefits in terms of Accounting Standard (AS) 15 (revised 2005), ‘ Employee Benefits’, which form part of O&M expenses have been recognised in the interim financial statements in proportion to actual sales for the period to projected sales for the year.”

8. According to the querist, the above treatment is followed to match the revenue of interim period with the cost for that period in order to present the true and fair view. In the half year accounts for the period ended 30.09.2007, the following disclosure was made through notes to accounts:

     “Tariff is fixed by CERC in terms of prescribed norms, which is known as annual fixed charges (AFC). AFC consists of interest on loan, depreciation including advance against depreciation (AAD), operation & maintenance (O&M) expenses, interest on working capital and return on equity. April to September is the peak period of generation because of availability of water. Accordingly, depreciation, AAD, interest on loan, self insurance and provision for long term employee benefits and post employment benefits in terms of Accounting Standard 15 (revised 2005), which form part of O&M expenses have been recognised in interim financial statements in proportion to actual sales for the period to projected sales for the year resulting into lower profit after tax for the half year ended 30.09.2007 by Rs.259.20 crore.”

9. In nutshell, as per the querist, the above treatment is being followed owing to following:

      (i) Being under regulatory regime, cost plus assured return in terms of return on equity (ROE) is recovered through tariff.

     (ii) Profit should be more or less equal to assured return less short recovery of any expenses. This fact would not be reflected from the financial statements, if all costs are booked as period costs and are not matched with revenue.

10. However, the disclosure as mentioned in paragraph 8 above was referred to by the statutory auditors in their report as below:

     “Refer Para 14 of notes to accounts regarding certain expenses including depreciation, AAD, interest on loan, self insurance and long term employees benefit and post employment benefits having been recognised in the financial statements for the half period ended 30th September, 2007, in proportion to actual sale for the half year to projected sale for the full year. Consequently, profit for the half year is lower by Rs.259.20 crore.”

11. The contention of the auditors is that such costs are period costs and should not be recognised in proportion of actual sales to budgeted sales.

B. Query

12. The querist has sought the opinion of the Expert Advisory Committee as to whether the accounting treatment followed by the company is correct.

C. Points considered by the Committee

13. The Committee notes from the Facts of the Case that at one place (paragraph 6), it is mentioned that all cost components are recorded in the accounts on actual basis following accrual system, whereas at another place (paragraph 7), it is mentioned that the company has been following the principle of recognising depreciation and other cost components in proportion to actual sales for the period to projected sales for the year. Thus, there seems to be a contradiction in the Facts of the Case. The Committee’s opinion is based on the presumption that the company in question is charging the annual fixed charges (AFC) fixed by the CERC as expenses in the financial statements, which is in proportion to actual sales for the period to projected sales for the year. The Committee has not examined whether the amounts recognised in respect of the AFC in the financial statements are as per the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, particularly those prescribed in the Accounting Standards, as that issue has not been raised. The Committee has, thus, examined only the question raised, viz., spreading the AFC over the interim financial statements due to seasonality of operations.

14. The Committee further notes from the Facts of the Case that AFC is fixed by CERC for a period of 5 years. Thus, the Committee presumes that rate of recovery of AFC as a part of tariff does not change over a period of 5 years. The Committee also notes that apart from annual fixed charges which are considered by CERC in the fixation of tariff charges, certain variable charges are also factored in the tariff fixation which have not been stated by the querist in the Facts of the Case. However, this fact does not affect the opinion on the issue raised.

15. The Committee notes from the Facts of the Case that the revenues generated by the company are seasonal due to more availability of water in the first two quarters of the year. In this context, the Committee notes paragraphs 16, 18, 19, 27, 36 and 37 of Accounting Standard (AS) 25, ‘Interim Financial Reporting’, which provide as follows:

      “16. An enterprise should include the following information, as a minimum, in the notes to its interim financial statements, if material and if not disclosed elsewhere in the interim financial report:

       (a) …

       (b) explanatory comments about the seasonality of interim operations;

       …

      The above information should normally be reported on a financial year-to-date basis. However, the enterprise should also disclose any events or transactions that are material to an understanding of the current interim period.”

       “18. Interim reports should include interim financial statements (condensed or complete) for periods as follows:

         (a) balance sheet as of the end of the current interim period and a comparative balance sheet as of the end of the immediately preceding financial year;

         (b) statements of profit and loss for the current interim period and cumulatively for the current financial year to date, with comparative statements of profit and loss for the comparable interim periods (current and year-to-date) of the immediately preceding financial year;

        (c) cash flow statement cumulatively for the current financial year to date, with a comparative statement for the comparable year-to-date period of the immediately preceding financial year.


19. For an enterprise whose business is highly seasonal, financial information for the twelve months ending on the interim reporting date and comparative information for the prior twelve-month period may be useful. Accordingly, enterprises whose business is highly seasonal are encouraged to consider reporting such information in addition to the information called for in the preceding paragraph.”

       “27. An enterprise should apply the same accounting policies in its interim financial statements as are applied in its annual financial statements, except for accounting policy changes made after the date of the most recent annual financial statements that are to be reflected in the next annual financial statements. However, the frequency of an enterprise’s reporting (annual, half-yearly, or quarterly) should not affect the measurement of its annual results. To achieve that objective, measurements for interim reporting purposes should be made on a year-todate basis.”

      “36. Revenues that are received seasonally or occasionally within a financial year should not be anticipated or deferred as of an interim date if anticipation or deferral would not be appropriate at the end of the enterprise’s financial year.


       37. Examples include dividend revenue, royalties, and government grants. Additionally, some enterprises consistently earn more revenues in certain interim periods of a financial year than in other interim periods, for example, seasonal revenues of retailers. Such revenues are recognised when they occur.”

16. On the basis of paragraphs 36 and 37 of AS 25 reproduced above, the Committee is of the view that the company cannot defer recognition of revenue in the interim financial statements if these are seasonal in nature; these have to be recognised as these occur during the interim periods. Similarly, keeping in view the requirements of paragraph 27 of AS 25, the company has to follow the same accounting policies in its interim financial statements as are applied in its annual financial statements in respect of expenses also. Recognising the seasonal nature of various industries, AS 25 suggests certain disclosures to be made, e.g., under paragraph 16(b) and paragraph 19 of AS 25 (see also Appendix 2 of AS 25). Thus, AS 25 does not allow different basis of recognition and measurement of revenues and expenses for seasonal industries; only additional disclosures are required or permitted.

D. Opinion

17. On the basis of the above, the Committee is of the opinion that the accounting treatment followed by the company is not correct.

 

1 Opinion finalised by the Committee on 30.4.2008