Query No. 38 A. Facts of the Case
1. A public sector undertaking is wholly owned by the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD). The company is in the business of generation of power. The company has two power stations in operation, the tariff of which is regulated by the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (DERC)/Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC). The company had planned to set up a project of 750 megawatt (MW) gas based combined cycle power plant at Bamnauli (hereinafter referred to as the ‘project’). The same was to be set up with debt/equity ratio of 30:70. 2. Equity for the project was to be invested by the GNCTD and debt portion was proposed to be availed equally from the GNCTD and Power Finance Corporation. The GNCTD had contributed towards equity amounting to Rs. 100 crore and Rs. 300 crore on 04.04.2011 and 30.11.2011, respectively. The company had initiated the pre-construction activity by awarding the contract to A Ltd. for diversion of 400 KV Bawana-Bamnauli D/C and 400 KV Ballabhgarh-Bamnauli transmission line. As per the contract with A Ltd. for pre-construction activity of the project, the company has been making payment out of the equity funds. The GNCTD had directed to the company that it should not incur any cost for construction of the project without any firm commitment of allotment of gas by the Central Electricity Authority/Government of India. 3. The querist has stated that the company on a regular basis has been investing the amount available in surplus out of the equity received for the project in the term deposits with the public sector banks as per the investment policy of the company. As per the conditions of sanction of equity contribution of the GNCTD, the interest income, if any, on the equity amount of the GNCTD shall be utilised as additional equity of the GNCTD and is to be utilised for the respective project. As the interest earned on equity funds is income of the company, no additional equity shares are being allotted to the GNCTD against such interest earned. The company has accounted for the interest as ‘income’ and has been re-investing the interest amount alongwith the balance equity available in the term deposits with public sector banks. The said amount of interest, being accounted for as income, is subject to income tax and is being retained in surplus profit and loss account on year-to-year basis. As on 31.03.2014, the company had outstanding equity amount of Rs. 301.20 crore and interest income as Rs. 45.64 crore, which has been invested in term deposits of public sector banks and shown under investments. 4. The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India, while conducting supplementary audit for the financial year (F.Y.) 2013-14, has issued the following Half-Margin:
5. In reply to the half margin, the management has submitted the reply duly confirmed by statutory auditor, which is as below:
The querist has also stated that there is no provision in the regulations of DERC/CERC for creation of any special reserve.
B. Query
6. In view of this, the querist has sought the opinion of the Expert Advisory Committee on the following issues:
C. Points considered by the Committee 7. The Committee notes that the basic issue raised in the query relates to accounting for the interest earned from the investments of the surplus equity funds, where there is a restriction on utilisation of interest amount. The Committee has, therefore, considered only this issue and has not examined any other issue that may arise from the Facts of the Case, such as, treatment of equity contribution by the GNCTD, treatment of debt contribution by the GNCTD and A Ltd., disclosure of term deposits by the company in its financial statements, etc. Further, it may be mentioned that the opinion expressed hereinafter is purely from the accounting perspective and not from the perspective of interpreting any legal enactments, such as, Income-tax Act, 1961.
8. The Committee notes that in order to determine the treatment of interest earned from the investments of surplus equity funds of the company, it is necessary to examine whether the interest earned by the company is an income to the company or not. In this regard, the Committee notes the following paragraph from the ‘Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements’, issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, which reads as below:
From the above, the Committee is of the view that although there are restrictions on the utilisation of funds for the purpose of project only, interest earned by the company by investing the equity funds results into enhancement of assets for the company and accordingly, is an income to the company. The Committee further notes paragraph 5 of Accounting Standard (AS) 5, ‘Net Profit or Loss for the Period, Prior Period Items and Changes in Accounting Policies’, notified under the Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006, as reproduced below:
On the basis of the above, the Committee is of the view that the interest earned on investments made out of the surplus equity funds should be credited to the statement of profit and loss as income of the company. However, in view of the specific requirement as per the conditions of sanction of equity contribution of the GNCTD that the interest income, if any, on the equity amount of GNCTD, shall be utilised as additional equity of GNCTD and is to be utilised for the respective project, as stated in paragraph 3 of the Facts of the Case, the Committee is of the view that the said interest after routing through the statement of profit and loss may be transferred to a specific reserve as an appropriation of profits with necessary disclosure in financial statements.
D. Opinion
9. On the basis of the above, the Committee is of the following opinion on the issues raised by the querist in paragraph 6 above:
_____________________________ [1]Opinion finalised by the Committee on 11.12.2014.
|